The Impact of Cash Holdings on Firm Performance: Panel Evidence from Textile Sector Companies Listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (2016–2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63544/jbii.v5i9.210Keywords:
Cash Holdings, Firm Performance, Return on Assets (ROA), Leverage, Panel Data, Fixed Effects, Random Effects, Textile Sector, Pakistan Stock ExchangeAbstract
This paper investigates the effect of cash holdings on the financial performance of textile firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX) from 2016 to 2025. The cash management policy of firms has been discussed in the literature for many years. On one hand, cash serves as insurance against expensive outside financing (Myers & Majluf, 1984; Opler et al., 1999), but on the other hand, cash gives managers the ability to indulge in discretionary spending that decreases firm value (Jensen, 1986). The Pakistani textile industry, which is the biggest export earner and one of the most leveraged industries in Pakistan, constitutes a good sample through which to revisit this question, since the majority of studies conducted in Pakistan about cash holdings have investigated the determinants of cash holding rather than the effects, while few others have stopped at the mid-2010s. In this study, we used a hand-verified dataset of 20 firms listed on the PSX in the textile industry with 198 firm-year observations after cleaning the data and estimating pooled OLS, fixed effects, and random effects models of ROA on cash holdings, firm size, leverage, and firm age. Statistical tests (Breusch-Pagan LM test, Modified Wald test, and Wooldridge test) identify firm-specific random effects, heteroskedasticity among firms, and first-order autocorrelation, which are controlled using firm-clustered standard errors. On the other hand, the Hausman test supports the Random-Effects specification (χ²(4) = 7.97, p = 0.093). However, results for Fixed Effects are also provided as a robustness check. The relationship between cash and ROA is positive but statistically insignificant in all specifications. Leverage is found to have a highly significant negative impact on profitability in all specifications (p < 0.01), while firm size and firm age are significant only in the Fixed-Effects specification. These results imply that, in an economy where the availability of capital is limited and banking plays an important role as a source of finance, and also where the levels of cash are low (i.e., in Pakistan), having more liquid cash by the firm is not an important factor in determining its profitability—capital structure decisions, especially leverage, are far more important.
References
Afza, T., & Adnan, S. M. (2007). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: A case study of Pakistan. In Proceedings of the Singapore Economic Review Conference (pp. 1–15).
Ahmad, N., et al. (2023). Impact of financial flexibility on investment, cash balance, and firm performance: Evidence from Pakistani textile companies. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 11(3), 112–125.
Ali, S., Ullah, M., & Ullah, N. (2016). Determinants of corporate cash holdings: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(4), 1544–1550.
Al-Najjar, B. (2013). The financial determinants of corporate cash holdings: Evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 22(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.02.004
Anjum, S., & Malik, Q. A. (2013). Determinants of corporate liquidity: An empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(2), 1–8.
Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
Ferreira, M. A., & Vilela, A. S. (2004). Why do firms hold cash? Evidence from EMU countries. European Financial Management, 10(2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2004.00251.x
Iqbal, M. J., & Usman, M. (2018). Impact of financial leverage on firm performance: Evidence from textile composite sector of Pakistan. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 6(2), 60–66.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan.
Kim, C. S., Mauer, D. C., & Sherman, A. E. (1998). The determinants of corporate liquidity: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(3), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331099
Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., & Williamson, R. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3
Ozkan, A., & Ozkan, N. (2004). Corporate cash holdings: An empirical investigation of UK companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(9), 2103–2134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.08.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karnal Sher

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.