Unravelling the Puzzle of Job Complexity, Personality, and Creative Performance

Abstract

The intricate interplay between job complexity, personality traits, and creative performance lies at the heart of this study. In today's dynamic market, organizations seek employees who can thrive in complex jobs, generating innovative solutions and driving organizational growth. While previous research has explored the individual impacts of these factors, this study delves deeper, examining how personality moderates the relationship between job complexity and creative performance. This study examined the impact of job complexity, independent variable, on creative performance, dependent variable, moderated by Big Five personality traits. Using cross-sectional data and questionnaires, the study aimed to determine the relationship between these variables in individuals working diverse jobs and organizational cultures. Statistical analysis with SPSS software supported the hypothesized positive impact of complexity on creativity, mediated by personality traits. This study aims to bridge the gap between existing research on job design, creativity, and personality. By elucidating the moderating role of personality, we hope to provide valuable insights for organizations seeking to optimize job design and cultivate a workforce capable of thriving in complex environments. By understanding the interplay between these factors, we can empower organizations to unlock the full potential of their employees and achieve sustainable success in today's competitive market. This study found that complex jobs promote creativity, encouraging employees to adapt and solve problems innovatively. Managers seek flexible, hardworking individuals for these roles, while HR focuses on talent fit for uncertain, complex jobs. The study confirms a positive impact of job complexity on creativity due to the pressure it creates. Individuals redesign their jobs to cope, seeking creative solutions to complex problems. However, new resources can further ease demanding jobs. Personality moderates the relationship between complexity and creativity. Extraverts thrive in complex roles, seeking professional growth and enjoying challenges. Openness to experience fosters quick-witted adaptability and innovation. Conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness all positively moderate the relationship, while neuroticism hinders it. Trustworthy, supportive, and adaptable individuals flourish in complex settings, while those prone to stress and negativity struggle. This research suggests designing stimulating jobs that promote employee growth and highlights the importance of personality in navigating complex, creative work environments.

References

Ali, A., Pasha, A. T., & Malik, S. (2022). Effect Of Humor Leadership On Inventiveness Of Employees And Administrative Reliability. Emotional Intelligence's Moderating Impact. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Arts, 1(1), 104-121.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357.

Arpaci, I., Karatas, K., Kusci, I., & Al-Emran, M. (2022). Understanding the social sustainability of the Metaverse by integrating UTAUT2 and big five personality traits: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach. Technology in Society, 71, 102120.

Asghar, R. J., Ishaque, A., & Sayyam. (2021). Big Five Personality Traits and Training Transfer: Evidence from Banking Sector in Pakistan. Multicultural Education, 7(8), 653-665.

Asghar, R. J., Shah, M., & Khan, J. A. (2021). Big Five Personality Traits and Training Transfer: Does Organizational Politics Matter? International Review of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(4), 457-469.

Asif, M. (2021). Contingent Effect of Conflict Management towards Psychological Capital and Employees’ Engagement in Financial Sector of Islamabad [PhD Dissertation, Preston University, Kohat, Islamabad Campus.]. Islamabad.

Asif, M., Khan, A., & Pasha, M. A. (2019). Psychological Capital of Employees’ Engagement: Moderating Impact of Conflict Management in the Financial Sector of Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, IV(III), 160-172.

Asif, M., & Shaheen, A. (2022). Creating a High-Performance Workplace by the determination of Importance of Job Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Leadership. Journal of Business Insight and Innovation, 1(2), 9-15.

Aurangzeb, Alizai, S. H., Asif, M., & Rind, Z. K. J. I. J. o. M. (2021). RELEVANCE OF MOTIVATIONAL THEORIES AND FIRM HEALTH. 12(3), 1130-1137.

Aurangzeb, & Asif, M. (2021). Role of Leadership in Digital Transformation: A Case of Pakistani SMEs.

Aurangzeb, Asif, M., & Amin, M. K. (2021). RESOURCES MANAGEMENT AND SME'S PERFORMANCE. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 9(3), 679-689. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2021.9367

Azucar, D., Marengo, D., & Settanni, M. (2018). Predicting the Big 5 personality traits from digital footprints on social media: A meta-analysis. Personality and individual differences, 124, 150-159.

Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer, 16.

Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.

Bissola, R., Imperatori, B., & Colonel, R. T. (2014). Enhancing the creative performance of new product teams: An organizational configurational approach. Journal of product innovation management, 31(2), 375-391.

Capone, F., Lazzeretti, L., & Innocenti, N. (2021). Innovation and diversity: the role of knowledge networks in the inventive capacity of cities. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 773-788.

Cetindamar Kozanoglu, D., & Abedin, B. (2021). Understanding the role of employees in digital transformation: conceptualization of digital literacy of employees as a multi-dimensional organizational affordance. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(6), 1649-1672.

Chae, H., & Choi, J. N. (2018). Contextualizing the effects of job complexity on creativity and task performance: Extending job design theory with social and contextual contingencies. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 91(2), 316-339.

Choi, Y. (2019). Knowledge Appropriation and Inventive Productivity.

Chung-Yan, G. A. (2010). The nonlinear effects of job complexity and autonomy on job satisfaction, turnover, and psychological well-being. Journal of occupational health psychology, 15(3), 237.

de Matos, C. M., Goncalves, E., & Freguglia, R. d. S. (2021). Knowledge diffusion channels in Brazil: The effect of inventor mobility and inventive collaboration on regional invention. Growth and Change, 52(2), 909-932.

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 124(2), 197.

Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management review, 17(2), 183-211.

Gocłowska, M. A., Ritter, S. M., Elliot, A. J., & Baas, M. (2019). Novelty seeking is linked to openness and extraversion, and can lead to greater creative performance. Journal of personality, 87(2), 252-266.

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26.

Goldberg, L. R. (2013). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. In Personality and Personality Disorders (pp. 34-47). Routledge.

Golden, T. D., & Gajendran, R. S. (2019). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter’s job in their performance: Examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(1), 55-69.

Harris, K., English, T., Harms, P. D., Gross, J. J., & Jackson, J. J. (2017). Why are extraverts more satisfied? Personality, social experiences, and subjective well–being in college. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 170-186.

Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do you motivate employees (Vol. 65). Harvard Business Review Boston, MA.

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., & Judiesch, M. K. (1990). Individual differences in output variability as a function of job complexity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 28.

Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management journal, 49(3), 561-575.

Kata, D., & Kahn, K. L. (1966). The Sociai Po'citoiogy of Organizations. In: New York: John Wiley St Sons.

Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2010). Factors affecting employee knowledge acquisition and application capabilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2(2), 133-152.

Lei, H., Leaungkhamma, L., & Le, P. B. (2020). How transformational leadership facilitates innovation capability: the mediating role of employees' psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 481-499.

Martinaityte, I., Sacramento, C., & Aryee, S. (2019). Delighting the customer: Creativity-oriented high-performance work systems, frontline employee creative performance, and customer satisfaction. Journal of management, 45(2), 728-751.

McCrae, R. R., & Greenberg, D. M. (2014). Openness to experience. The Wiley handbook of genius, 222-243.

Mount, M. K., Barrick, M. R., & Stewart, G. L. (1998). Personality predictors of performance in jobs involving interaction with others. Human Performance, 11(3), 145-166.

Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2013). A theory of behavior in organizations. Academic Press.

Nisula, A.-M., Heinänen, S., Kianto, A., Toth, I., & Blomqvist, K. (2022). A psychological perspective on the sociotechnical enablers of knowledge worker digital creativity. Digital Creativity, 33(4), 314-328.

Paramitha, A., & Indarti, N. (2014). Impact of the environment support on creativity: Assessing the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 102-114.

Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and individual differences, 32(7), 1215-1228.

Salgado, J. F. (1997). The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 30.

Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D. S., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 557.

Viswesvaran, C., Schmidt, F. L., & Ones, D. S. (2002). The moderating influence of job performance dimensions on convergence of supervisory and peer ratings of job performance: Unconfounding construct-level convergence and rating difficulty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 345.

Wang, C.-J., Tsai, H.-T., & Tsai, M.-T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism management, 40, 79-89.

Waples, E. P., & Friedrich, T. L. (2011). Managing creative performance: Important strategies for leaders of creative efforts. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(3), 366-385.

Zacher, H., & Frese, M. (2009). Remaining time and opportunities at work: Relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychology and aging, 24(2), 487.